https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYaHpQruEzg
Although
this wasn’t a task I had to work half as long on as previous ones, I understand
its importance in showing an understanding and competence for using Web 2.0
tools. The difficulties lied not in my ability to produce this video segment
but in fact in the practicalities of keeping to the task’s objective, “a 45
second clip”.
My first
thoughts were “Forty-five seconds? That’s loads of time! What could I possibly
have to say that would last that long?” I wrote a short script (can you tell I’m
an actor) to refer to whilst recording was taking place. This approach was not
taken as a means to increase my self-confidence in front of a camera but to ensure
that my thoughts and intentions were being presented in a cohesive and
structured manner for viewers. My draft for the video (forgive my rough
handwriting) can be viewed below.
You will notice that a lot has been cut and replaced. I could have uploaded my final draft (viewers would certainly have had a better chance reading it) but the evolution and change in its structure would have been lost which I felt was an important factor of this task. My final draft also took on more of a bullet-point form so in practice it only served myself. I felt this would lessen the chances of my delivery coming across as mechanical.
The video
itself took a lot longer than anticipated. I thought I would be able to rattle
off my side notes but I found myself stumbling over my words in my first few
attempts. After slowing down and allowing myself to take the time necessary, I
managed to get a few different takes of the video in. Upon watching them back,
I realised I was clocking in way above the forty-five second mark (some of the
takes a minute and a half) and began looking at points made that could be
shortened or removed to meet the required time. After whittling down the
information to what I felt to be the bare components needed, I felt this was
more in line with the time goal. It was still clocking in over forty-five
seconds, however I felt that taking away any more would only prove a disservice
in expressing my impressions and intentions.
I think this
task as an extension to 1a: a professional profile. When confronted with an
obstacle such as a time or word-count limit, I have to work within the given
parameters. The difference between them is that unlike the prior task, I have
essentially failed to meet the criteria for this one. But rather than look at
this task as a failure, it has actually highlighted areas of which I can choose
to work upon moving forward. And so, this video will serve as a reminder for me
to tackle all future tasks, when required, with as concise yet detailed
communication as possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment